Perceptions of Political Discrimination and Political Activity Coercion in the Federal Service

View at publisher
Authors: Nevbahar Ertas
Cited by: 0
References: 37

Abstract

This study examines perceptions of prohibited personnel practices (PPPs) involving partisan politics in the federal workforce. Among the 18 prohibited practices tracked by the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, two—political affiliation discrimination and political activity coercion—doubled in a decade from 2010 to 2021. First, the perceived prevalence of PPPs involving partisan politics is examined by agency and organizational ethical climate. Then, multivariate models are used to investigate whether perceptions of political affiliation discrimination and political activity coercion influence federal employees’ turnover intentions and attitudes toward their agencies as workplaces. The analysis showed that such perceptions negatively affected public servants, making them less likely to recommend their agency as a workplace and more likely to consider leaving their agency. The discussion articulates why partisan politics in civil service is a critical topic for democratic governance and organizational theory in general, and human resource management in particular.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Public Policy and Administration Research Electoral Systems and Political Participation

Publication details

Journal / source
Public Personnel Management
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
311–333
Publication date
19 January 2026
Language
EN