Deprivation or Dominance? Examining the Psychological Antecedents of Historical Negation Among Europeans Over Time

Read full text
Authors: Kieren James Lilly, Zoe Bertenshaw, Chantelle Kimberley, Tamino Konur, Chris G. Sibley, Danny Osborne
Cited by: 0
References: 76

Abstract

Although historical negation—the ideologically-based denial of the contemporary relevance of colonial injustices—sustains inequities between settler colonisers and Indigenous peoples, few studies explore the psychological processes underlying historical negation among settler colonisers. In this pre-registered study, we examine whether perceived group-based relative deprivation (GRD) fosters historical negation among New Zealand Europeans. To do so, we use seven annual waves of data from a nationwide panel sample of New Zealand European adults ( N = 26,759) and random intercept cross-lagged panel modelling to predict within-person changes in historical negation over time. Contrary to our hypotheses, no significant within-person associations emerged between GRD and historical negation. GRD did, however, have a positive between-person association with historical negation among sole-identifying New Zealand Europeans. These results indicate that GRD among settler colonisers correlates with—but does not drive—the minimisation of the present-day relevance of colonial injustices.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Social and Intergroup Psychology Racial and Ethnic Identity Research Indigenous Health Education and Rights

Publication details

Journal / source
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Pages
1461672261419543–1461672261419543
Publication date
15 February 2026
Language
EN