Hemodynamic monitoring during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review

Read full text
Authors: Roberto Lorusso, Maria Elena De Piero, Silvia Mariani, Justine Mafalda Ravaux, Pasquale Nardelli, Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs, Fabio Guarracino, Nicolo’ Antonino Patroniti, Bas C. T. van Bussel, Iwan C.C. van der Horst, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Silver Heinsar
+16 more Kiran Shekar, Michael H. Yamashita, Nchafatso G. Obonyo, Anna L. Ciullo, Jordi Riera, Heidi J. Dalton, Anson Wang, Akram M. Zaaqoq, Graeme MacLaren, Kollengode R. Ramanathan, Jacky Y. Suen, Gianluigi Li Bassi, Kei Sato, John Francis Fraser, Giles J. Peek, Rakesh Christopher Arora
Cited by: 0
References: 71

Abstract

BackgroundIn adult patients receiving veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO), cardiovascular performance plays a critical role in determining oxygen delivery, organ perfusion and safe titration of extracorporeal support. Despite the increasing VV ECMO use, contemporary guidance on hemodynamic monitoring remains limited and largely experience-based. This scoping review aimed to map available basic and advanced monitoring approaches and to identify current evidence gaps.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception until September 2025, along with reference lists of relevant articles. We included studies of any design reporting techniques, targets, or protocols for hemodynamic monitoring during VV ECMO.ResultsOf 465 records screened, 106 met inclusion criteria. No protocolized, evidence-based hemodynamic monitoring protocol specific to VV ECMO was identified. The available evidence was heterogeneous and mostly derived from physiologic studies or single-center observational cohorts. Findings were narratively synthesized across three domains: basic bedside monitoring, diagnostic/prognostic tools and advanced assessment of cardiopulmonary interaction. Across studies, no monitoring strategy consistently reduced time-to-wean or mortality. Observational data suggested that care bundles and multidisciplinary approaches may reduce complications. However, the risk of bias limits causal inference.ConclusionsDespite the complex interaction between native cardiovascular function and extracorporeal circulation, VV ECMO lacks consensus on evidence-based hemodynamic monitoring pathways. A pragmatic core monitoring bundle with tiered triggers for escalation is necessary. Future priorities include implementation models based on multidisciplinary teams, specific training, standardized bundles, and multicenter studies aimed to define right ventricular-centered targets to improve safety and clinical decision-making.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Advanced battery technologies research

Publication details

Journal / source
Perfusion
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Volume
41
Issue
1_suppl
Pages
95S–109S
Publication date
1 May 2026
Language
EN