Systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive assessments used to detect deficits in the bilateral carotid artery stenosis model for vascular cognitive impairment

Read full text
Authors: Matthew Padgett, Nela Fucelova, Johannes Boltze, Timothy J England, Tuuli M Hietamies, Karen J. Horsburgh, Terence J. Quinn, Emily S. Sena, Lorraine M. Work, Marietta Zille, Rebecca C. Trueman, Tracy D. Farr
Cited by: 1
References: 43

Abstract

Hypoperfusion via bilateral carotid artery stenosis is the most common mouse model of vascular cognitive impairment, but the literature varies surrounding which behavioural tests are most appropriate to detect cognitive deficits in this model. We aimed to address this via a systematic review and meta-analysis. We also aimed to provide a recommendation that also considers how the tests cover the different cognitive domains. We identified 1714 publications and extracted data from 56. Interestingly, only six cognitive behavioural tests were employed across the literature with the most common being the Morris water and radial arm mazes, followed by the Y maze, novel object recognition, open field, and the Barnes maze. While all examined tests were able to detect cognitive impairments in hypoperfused mice, there was a high degree of heterogeneity across the publications, highlighting that not all research groups consistently observed cognitive deficits in the model. There was also evidence of publication bias, and occasionally some publications with extremely high effect sizes were influential. We recommend all tests, but ideally experiments should be complemented with additional approaches that examine a greater range of cognitive functions.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases Neurological Disorders and Treatments

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
1616–1626
Publication date
17 January 2026
Language
EN