Comparative Outcomes of Autograft and Allograft in Hip Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2026

View at publisher
Authors: Mark Kurapatti, Matthew R. Yuro, Brian S. Tao, Matthew D. Ramey, Srivatsan Swaminathan, Auston R. Locke, Niklas H. Koehne, Robert L. Parisien
DOI: 10.1177/03635465251408832
Cited by: 1
References: 64

Abstract

Background: There is currently no consensus regarding the superiority of allografts or autografts in labral hip reconstruction. Purpose: To compare patient outcomes after arthroscopic labral reconstruction using autografts versus allografts. Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were queried on February 2, 2025. Original outcome studies on arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction with clearly delineated graft type and a mean follow-up of at least 1 year were included. Studies with a mean follow-up

Fields of Study & Subjects

Hip disorders and treatments Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty Hip and Femur Fractures

Publication details

Journal / source
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Volume
54
Issue
7
Pages
1771–1784
Publication date
29 January 2026
Language
EN