A Chatbot for the Management of Bipolar Disorder: Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation With an Open-Weight Large Language Model to Answer Clinical Questions Based on the CANMAT and ISBD 2018 Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder: Un dialogueur pour la prise en charge du trouble bipolaire : utiliser la génération augmentée par récupération avec un grand modèle de langage (GML) à poids ouverts pour répondre aux questions cliniques fondées sur les lignes directrices de 2018 de CANMAT et de l'ISBD relatives au trouble bipolaire

Read full text
Authors: Yash Mali, Zejiao Zeng, Kayoung Heo, G Zhang, Antarip Kashyap, Jincheng Chen, Kamyar Keramatian, Gayatri Saraf, Marco Solmi, Edwin Tam, Sagar V. Parikh, Ayal Schaffer
+4 more Serge Beaulieu, Raymond Ng, Lakshmi N. Yatham, John-Jose Nuñez
Cited by: 1
References: 36

Abstract

Objective Clinical practice guidelines support evidence-based care but are often underused due to complexity, time constraints, and navigation challenges. We investigated whether a conversational agent (chatbot) using an open-weight large language model (LLM) with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) could provide guideline-consistent answers for bipolar disorder management based on the full 2018 Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and ISBD guidelines, comparing against a system using only the base LLM. Method We developed a multi-step RAG-based chatbot that retrieves relevant guideline sections and generates responses using Llama 3.3 70B. Twenty-one clinical vignettes spanning all guideline sections were created. Six expert psychiatrists generated queries and were presented with paired responses without labels from 2 systems: one using the base Llama 3.3 70B model, the other RAG-enhanced. Responses were rated for guideline consistency on a 3-point scale, and were analyzed using mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression. Results Experts evaluated 126 responses, of which 110 (87.3%) were rated as correct as or more correct than the baseline system. The RAG system produced 80 answers (63.5%) rated fully consistent with the guidelines versus 24 (19.0%) for baseline, and only 10 answers with major deviation (7.9%) versus 48 (38.1%) for baseline. Ordinal regression showed RAG responses were significantly more likely to be more correct (OR = 9.1, 95% CI [5.3-16.3], P < 0.001), which was consistent across all raters. Preference ratings favoured RAG answers in 78.7% of cases. Performance varied by vignette, with some errors in both retrieval and reasoning. Conclusion The use of RAG with an open-weight model helped produce answers consistent with the CANMAT guidelines across vignettes that required adapting or combining guideline text, suggesting a proof-of-concept of a bipolar guideline chatbot. We identified areas to improve results and evaluation. Future work should explore additional retrieval strategies and LLMs, and test in more naturalistic settings.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Digital Mental Health Interventions Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Mental Health via Writing

Publication details

Journal / source
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Pages
7067437261457232–7067437261457232
Publication date
11 June 2026
Language
EN