Doing Qualitative Participatory Research With Patients With Chronic Rare Diseases: Backstage Processes of Peer-Interviewing

Read full text
Authors: Giada Danesi, Guenda Bernegger, Lynda Sifer-Rivière, Isabelle Aujoulat, Anouck Alary, Eva Gil-Hernández, Mercedes Guilabert, Pura Ballester, José Joaquín Mira, Jane Sattoe, Maria Caiata Zufferey, Agnès Dumas
Cited by: 1
References: 41

Abstract

Peer research is a participatory approach in which citizens are actively involved as peer researchers (PRs) in all aspects of the research project alongside academic researchers (ARs). In qualitative studies, “peer-interviewing” raises some specific issues. There has been little discussion disentangling these specificities of peer-interviewing, and few papers report the processual experience of patients engaged in qualitative research as peer-interviewers. This article presents the backstage processes of a qualitative study where twelve PRs from four European countries, who were patients or caregivers, interviewed patients living with rare liver diseases, to understand their perceptions of their well-being and needs. A meta-study was conducted simultaneously in the four countries by ARs using a common methodology to ensure consistency in the research process, offering a unique opportunity to analyze the processes of peer-interviewing in the context of chronic rare diseases. This article sheds light on five main backstage processes of peer-interviewing: 1) feeling empowered; 2) patchworking skills; 3) managing resonance; 4) navigating reciprocity; and 5) maintaining commitment. An important finding was that these themes were present across different PRs’ profiles, which varied in terms of age, gender, patient organization membership, and time elapsed since diagnosis. Although some of these processes have been identified in other research contexts, we highlight their unique characteristics within health research. We also underscore the shadow labor of the ARs in providing logistic, emotional and scientific support to PRs and highlight the importance of enhancing reflexive practices in qualitative peer research involving vulnerable populations such as patients.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Mental Health and Patient Involvement Ethics in Clinical Research Health Policy Implementation Science

Publication details

Journal / source
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Volume
25
Publication date
19 January 2026
Language
EN