Comparing the structured versus unstructured planning of jump training in youth: An eight-week pilot study

Read full text
Authors: Jason Moran, Mark Williams, Jorge Arede, Hélmi Chaabène, Kurtis Cusimano, Urs Granacher, Yassine Negra, David George Behm, Raouf Hammami
Cited by: 0
References: 41

Abstract

Objectives This study compared the effectiveness of traditionally-planned (TPT) and randomly-planned (RPT) jump training regimens on physical performance metrics in youth academy soccer players. The groups undertook jump training with identical total programme volume and intensity, differing only in the order in which the prescribed training weeks were executed. Design A total of 28 male youth academy soccer players (mean age: 12.6 ± 0.26 yrs; height: 158.1 ± 7.24 cm; mass: 43.3 ± 5.1 kg; maturity offset: 0.81 ± 0.38 yrs; soccer experience: 4–5 years) were randomly assigned to either TPT or RPT groups, undertaking an eight-week training programme. Methods While the TPT group executed a planned training programme, the RPT group undertook identical training weeks performed in a randomised order with all other training variables being the same between the groups. Results Results indicated significant within-group improvements across all metrics (sprint speed [10 m, 20 m, 30 m], countermovement jump [CMJ], drop jump, and change of direction speed; [dz = 0.37 to 1.15; p =

Fields of Study & Subjects

Sports Performance and Training Physical Education and Training Studies Sport Psychology and Performance

Publication details

Journal / source
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Publication date
25 February 2026
Language
EN