Development and Validation of the Respiratory Secretion Scale (RESES) in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

View at publisher
Authors: Gabriela Ferrari, Jéssica Magnante, Laura Maito Mantelli, Alana Cristina Gonçalves, Rafhaela Mocelin, Polyana Karla Belotto, Roberta Fleck Bazzo, Gustavo Bruno Rático, Silvano Altair do Nascimento, Wan Cley Rabuske, Luis Felipe da Fonseca Reis, Diego de Carvalho
+1 more Antuani Rafael Baptistella
Cited by: 1
References: 18

Abstract

Background: Respiratory secretions are a common complication in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, yet no validated tool is available to classify secretion type and amount in this setting. Methods: We conducted a prospective study in 2 mixed ICUs in southern Brazil (January 2022–January 2024). Adult patients intubated for >24 h and requiring suctioning were eligible. Secretions were collected during routine suctioning, photographed, and classified using the newly developed Respiratory Secretion Scale (RESES). The scale categorizes secretions into 7 types (mucoid, mucopurulent-1, mucopurulent-2, purulent, bloody-mucoid, bloody, bloody-purulent) and 3 amounts (small, medium, large). Inter-observer reliability was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa. Associations between secretion characteristics and clinical variables were analyzed using chi-square, t test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, and multinomial logistic regression. Results: Among 70 subjects included in the validation phase, inter-observer agreement was excellent (kappa type = 0.87; amount = 0.85; combined = 0.82). In 398 subjects analyzed for clinical associations, purulent and bloody-mucoid secretions were more frequent among nonsurvivors, whereas mucoid secretions predominated among survivors (P = .03). Large secretion amounts were associated with respiratory disease, pulmonary infection focus, and longer duration of mechanical ventilation (all P < .05). In the multinomial logistic regression, the diagnosis and the pulmonary infection focus remained significantly associated with both secretion type (Relative Risks [RR] = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.05–1.56, P = .02; RR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.12–2.14, P = .008, respectively) and amount (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.08–2.44, P < .02; RR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.09–2.68, P = .02, respectively), although chest imaging with consolidation was associated only with secretion amount (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01–1.09, P < .007). Conclusions: The RESES is a simple, visual tool that standardized secretion assessment in mechanically ventilated subjects, improving clinical communication and providing a foundation for future research.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Nosocomial Infections in ICU Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units Respiratory Support and Mechanisms

Publication details

Journal / source
Respiratory Care
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Volume
71
Issue
10
Pages
19433654261447876–19433654261447876
Publication date
14 May 2026
Language
EN