Differential Patterns of Anger Expression in Response to Microaggressions Among LGBTQ Young Adults in India

Read full text
Authors: Soumalya Mukherjee, Soheli Datta
Cited by: 0
References: 21

Abstract

Microaggressions, as subtle yet persistent forms of discrimination, exert a profound psychological burden on sexual and gender minorities. Within India, where heteronormative expectations and collectivist cultural norms persist despite legal reforms, the emotional consequences of such experiences remain insufficiently understood. This study examined the relationship between sexual orientation-related microaggressions and anger expression among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) young adults, with particular attention to subgroup variations. A cross-sectional, correlational design was employed with 160 participants aged 18-35 years, recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. Participants completed the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Scale (SOMS) and the Anger Expression Scale and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Pearson correlations, and regression analysis. Results revealed that lesbian and gay participants reported the highest levels of microaggressions, whereas bisexual participants exhibited significantly greater anger-in than transgender participants. Correlational analyses highlighted subgroup-specific patterns, including an inverse relationship between microaggressions and anger-out among lesbian participants, a positive association between microaggressions and anger-out among bisexuals, and a positive association between microaggressions and anger-in among transgender participants. Regression findings identified anger-out as the sole significant predictor of microaggressions ( β = 0.24, P = .002). These findings underscore the heterogeneity of LGBTQ experiences in India, illustrating how microaggressions differentially influence anger regulation across identities. By framing anger expression within the minority stress model, the study highlights anger as both a psychological outcome of subtle discrimination and a mechanism sustaining minority stress, with implications for clinical intervention, theory development, and structural change.

Fields of Study & Subjects

LGBTQ Health Identity and Policy Racial and Ethnic Identity Research Gender and Feminist Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Psychosexual Health
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
289–297
Publication date
12 February 2026
Language
EN