The case for ocean iron fertilization field trials

Read full text
Authors: Ken O. Buesseler, Daniele Bianchi, Wil Burns, Fei Chai, Jay T. Cullen, Margaret Estapa, Makio Honda, Seth John, David M. Karl, Christine Klaas, Dou Li, Zihua Liu
+13 more Dennis J. McGillicuddy, Paul J. Morris, Jun Nishioka, Melissa Omand, Kilaparti Ramakrishna, Katherine M. Roche, David A. Siegel, Sarah R. Smith, Benjamin S. Twining, Mark B. Wells, Angelicque White, Peng Xiu, Joo‐Eun Yoon
Cited by: 6
References: 87

Abstract

Solving the climate-ocean crisis requires both cutting emissions and pursuing carbon dioxide removal (CDR). Past ocean iron fertilization (OIF) experiments in some parts of the ocean have shown that small additions of iron can enhance phytoplankton growth and CO 2 drawdown. However, prior experiments did not assess the efficacy, durability, or feasibility of OIF for CDR, and broader ecological and biogeochemical responses were not evaluated given the short duration and limited spatial scales. The next generation of OIF field trials must be larger (ca. 1000 km 2 ) and longer (>3–6 months) to observe the full response and return to baseline conditions. Potential risks will be assessed, while using community engagement and co-design to create go/no-go decision points. Planning and extrapolating impacts on regional and global scales will require modeling, with the overall goal to provide unbiased assessments and open-source protocols that can guide responsible and rigorous decision-making for any further OIF.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Marine and coastal ecosystems Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses Climate Change and Geoengineering

Publication details

Journal / source
Dialogues on climate change.
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Publication date
4 February 2026
Language
EN