ChatGPT-4o assists emergency physicians in enhancing diagnostic accuracy for fever of unknown origin: retrospective analysis

Read full text
Authors: Hui Long, Guoqing Huang, Xinbo Yin, Xiaojie Zheng, Sijia Cao, Nan Wang, Xiangmin Li, Xiaokai Wang
Cited by: 0
References: 21

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ChatGPT-4o’s diagnostic accuracy for fever of unknown origin (FUO) compared to emergency physicians and assess its utility as an adjunctive diagnostic tool. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 60 adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with FUO (fever ≥ 38.3℃ for ≥ 3 weeks without diagnosis after initial evaluation). Only patients with a confirmed final discharge diagnosis were included; FUO cases remaining undiagnosed at discharge were excluded. ChatGPT-4o and emergency medicine (EM) physicians independently generated preliminary diagnoses and comprehensive diagnoses. Diagnostic accuracy was compared against final discharge diagnoses. EM physicians subsequently revised their diagnoses after reviewing ChatGPT-4o’s output. Statistical analysis employed Welch’s ANOVA. RESULTS: ChatGPT-4o significantly outperformed EM residents in both preliminary (70.0% vs. 46.11%; 95% CI, 57.6%-79.9% vs. 34.4%-59.3%, P = 0.008) and comprehensive diagnoses (75.0% vs. 55.0%, 95% CI, 62.9%-84.1% vs. 42.5%-66.9%, P = 0.002). While numerically higher than EM specialists in both preliminary (70.0% vs. 57.78%) and comprehensive diagnoses (75.0% vs. 68.89%), these differences did not demonstrate consistent statistical superiority. Incorporating ChatGPT-4o’s suggestions significantly improved accuracy for both EM residents (preliminary: 67.78% vs. 46.11%, 95% CI, 55.8%-78.6% vs. 34.4%-59.3%, P = 0.002; comprehensive: 78.33% vs. 55.0%, 95% CI, 66.8%-86.6% vs. 42.5%-66.9%, P = 0.01) and specialists (preliminary: 70.22% vs. 57.78%, P = 0.023), though the improvement in specialists’ comprehensive diagnoses remained non-significant (80.89% vs. 66.67%, P = 0.076). Stratified analysis showed that ChatGPT-4o significantly improved diagnostic accuracy across major etiologic categories, including infectious (76.0% vs. 59.4%, P = 0.003) and cancer-related causes (72.2% vs. 50.0%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT-4o demonstrates potential to augment FUO diagnosis, particularly aiding less experienced clinicians. While this study highlights AI’s complementary value, prospective trials are needed to validate its impact on clinical efficiency.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills Hematological disorders and diagnostics Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Publication details

Journal / source
BMC Emergency Medicine
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
45–45
Publication date
10 January 2026
Language
EN