The impact of statin use on colorectal cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Read full text
Authors: Iman Elahi Vahed, Amir mohammad Rishialiabad, Fatemeh Moeinaddini, Amir Hosein Shabani, Asal Kazemzadeh, Mojtaba Esmaeeli, Mostafa Neshat Ghalibaf, Mahdiyeh Nozad Varjovi, Maryam Shirmohamadi, Mohaddese Heydari, Parsa Tavassoli Naini, Mohammadsadegh Jafari
+3 more Alireza Gholami, Hossein Soltaninejad, Mohammad Rahmanian
Cited by: 0
References: 44

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The evidence considering the potential protective impact of statins on the mortality rate caused by colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. This study aimed to systematically assess the effect of statins on the survival rate of CRC patients. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science to assess the relationship between statin consumption and cancer-specific mortality (CSM), all-cause mortality (ACM), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Subgroup analyses were performed to assess data stratified by country, study design, disease stage, time to use, CRC, and treatment type due to high heterogeneity. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were included; the data of 24 articles composed the meta-analysis. Statins improved prognosis of CRC, particularly in lower ACM (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.74–0.87) with I²=90%, P-value < 0.01, and lower CSM (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.67–0.82) with I²=88%, P-value < 0.01 when compared to non-users. Both pre- and post-diagnostic statin use were linked to lower ACM and CSM, though high heterogeneity was observed across studies. However, the results for statin use on RFS indicated an HR of 1.01 with 95% CI of 0.94 to 1.09 (I² = 0% and P-value = 0.93). Additionally, for DFS, the HR was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.85–1.01) with I² = 47%, suggesting no meaningful effect of statin use on DFS. No significant publication bias was found. CONCLUSION: Statin use was associated with a reduction in ACM and CSM in CRC patients. However, the variances in RFS and DFS were not statistically significant. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously due to substantial heterogeneity among some included studies.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cancer Lipids and Metabolism Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies Metabolism Diabetes and Cancer

Publication details

Journal / source
BMC Gastroenterology
Volume
26
Issue
1
Publication date
9 February 2026
Language
EN