A systematic review of participatory research involving forensic mental health patients

Read full text
Authors: Fenia Ferra, Peggy Walde, Marcel Daum, Stefan Teipel, Eva Drewelow, Olga Biernetzky, Birgit Vӧllm
Cited by: 3
References: 50

Abstract

There is currently limited information and guidance on utilising participatory research within forensic mental health settings. This systematic review aimed to explore the use of participatory research within those settings, identify helpful practices, barriers and challenges, as well as explore the impact reported of participatory research in research and knowledge production. Fourteen studies and eleven other types of publications have been identified from electronic databases, PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar and ProQuest and hand searches of academic journals. Thematic analysis was used for synthesising data collected. Four themes were identified: (1) Building equal relationships, (2) Speaking the same language, (3) An involving system, (4) Impact for all. Analysis showed that the use of participatory research in such settings relies on human interaction and equal co-production within commonly restrictive and coercive environments. The complexity of participatory research is also reflected in its reporting. A standardised (but also flexible) model of reporting would be valuable for future research. In addition to summarizing the findings of research in this area, we have compiled a list of ‘active ingredients’ for the successful use of participatory research in forensic mental health settings.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Mental Health and Patient Involvement Psychopathy Forensic Psychiatry Sexual Offending Health Policy Implementation Science

Publication details

Journal / source
BMC Psychiatry
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
85–85
Publication date
23 January 2026
Language
EN