Evaluating the diagnostic performance of miLab™ for detection of malaria parasites using nPCR as reference standard

Read full text
Authors: Ebenezer Kojo Addae, Theophilus Awortwe-Quaicoe, Benedict Sackey, Richard Owusu Ansah, Richard Larbi, Kinako Denis Elia Dazangapai, James Opoku Frimpong, Thelma Owusuaa Ofori Amoako, Alexander Asamoah, Nana Kwame Ayisi‐Boateng, Bernard Nkrumah, Franklin Asiedu Bekoe
+1 more M. D. Owusu Owusu
Cited by: 0
References: 29

Abstract

Abstract Malaria remains a leading health threat in sub-Saharan Africa, causing over 600,000 deaths annually. Ghana, ranked among the top 15 in malaria burden in Africa, relies heavily on microscopy for diagnosis due to its affordability and established use. However, limitations in sensitivity, turnaround time, and availability of skilled personnel despite ongoing national training efforts stress the need for improved diagnostics. This study evaluated miLab ™ , an AI-assisted automated malaria detection platform, using nested PCR (nPCR) as the reference standard. We conducted a hospital-based cross-sectional study from August 2024 to June 2025 in three malaria-endemic communities in Kumasi, Ashanti region and enrolled 300 suspected malaria patients (168 females, 132 males; aged 1–87 years, median 24). Blood samples were analyzed independently by miLab ™ , two independent mid-level microscopists, and nPCR. Discrepancies between the two microscopists were resolved by a WHO expert microscopist (adjudicated microscopy) to establish a microscopy reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy, correlation and measurement agreement were determined using GraphPad Prism Version 8. Parasite densities estimated by miLab ™ ranged from 0.95 to 5.34 log parasites/µL (median 3.52, IQR 2.93–3.91). For mid-level microscopist 1, densities ranged from 2.02 to 5.43, (median 4.02, IQR: 3.22–4.50), while Mid-level microscopist 2 measured densities between 1.98 and 5.22, (median 3.78, IQR: 3.15–4.23). When compared to nPCR, miLab ™ demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.23%, specificity of 98.98%, and accuracy of 97.33%, while adjudicated microscopy showed a sensitivity of 85.58%, specificity of 97.96%, and accuracy of 93.67%. These findings indicate that miLab ™ has better performance compared to microscopy for detection of malaria parasites. miLab™ could offer a reliable, rapid diagnostic alternative suitable for malaria-endemic, resource-limited settings where timely and accurate diagnosis is critical for effective case management and control.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Malaria Research and Control Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Publication details

Journal / source
Malaria Journal
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
109–109
Publication date
12 February 2026
Language
EN