Contraceptive and sexual health services during the COVID-19 pandemic and recovery: a mixed-methods study in England

Read full text
Authors: Alexandra Sawyer, Catherine R. H. Aicken, Jörg W. Huber, Jaime H. Vera, Deborah Williams, Moazzam Ali, Gabriela Garcia-Camacho, Armando Humberto Seuc, Nigel Sherriff, Luis Guillermo Bahamondes, Jose Guilherme Cecatti, Vilma Zotareli
+63 more Dr Rachel Soeiro, Karayna G Fernandes, Mariana B Rogerio, Samira M Haddad, Silvana F Bento, Padua, Karla Simonia de, 1968-, Aline Munezero, Charles M Charles, Montas Laporte, Eunice Nahyuha Chomi, Seni Kouanda, Flore Marie Gisèle Donessouné, Armel Emmanuel Sogo, Kun Tang, Yueping Guo, Hanxiyue Zhang, Yifan Zhu, Ge Yang, Chunxiao Peng, Xizhuo Xie, Hao Wang, Deda Ogum Alangea, Torpey Kwasi, Emefa Judith Modey, Adom Manu, Ernest Tei Maya, Rozina Karmaliani, Laila Akbar Ladak, Arusa Lakhani, Marina Baig, Yasmin P. Parpio, Salima Somani, Pisake Lumbiganon, Jen Sothornwit, Nampet Jampathong, Somporn Rungreangkulkij, Marleen Temmerman, Ferdinand Moyi Okwaro, Abdu Mohiddin, Massimo Mirandola, Maddalena Cordioli, Alessia Savoldi, Simone Garzon, Stefano Uccella, Ranieri Poli, Nigel Sherriff, Alexandra Sawyer, Catherine R. H. Aicken, Jörg W. Huber, Jaime H. Vera, Deborah Williams, Moazzam Ali, Caron Rahn Kim, Vanessa Brizuela, Hamsadvani Kuganantham, Grace Kapustianyk, Igor Toskin, Soe Soe Thwin, Anna M. Thorson, Joy Jerop Chebet, Hugo Gamerro Abrego, Armando Humberto Seuc, Gabriela Garcia Camacho
Cited by: 1
References: 16

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is essential for public health. COVID-19 led to major disruptions in the provision of essential services including SRH services. Within the context of a multi-country project, this study aimed to explore individual and service-level impacts on contraceptive and sexual health services during the COVID-19 pandemic and recovery phase in England. METHODS: A longitudinal, mixed-methods design was implemented, collecting data in two phases, approximately 9 months apart (November 2021 and July 2022). The study comprised in-depth interviews with staff (n = 4) and clients (n = 20) of a sexual health and contraceptive clinical service in the Southeast of England. Over the same timeframe, a quantitative service availability and readiness assessment (SARA) was completed, based on World Health Organization validated tools. RESULTS: Sexual health and contraceptive services continued to operate throughout the pandemic, however measures taken to prevent COVID-19 transmission and staff capacity issues (due to staff redeployment, staff sickness) impacted on patient choice (e.g. how the service could be accessed, methods of contraception available) and patient experience (e.g. delays in accessing healthcare). Despite disruptions, staff described how in-person provision remained available almost continuously for urgent/vulnerable cases. SARA data confirmed service availability, and qualitative data indicate how this was managed. For example, postal home self-sampling for STIs/HIV was expanded and contraceptive counselling by telephone was introduced to reduce clinic visits, and was retained due to popularity. At Time 2, services were running close to normal. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 disrupted sexual health and contraceptive services in England. Compared to pre-pandemic, more elements of these services were delivered remotely. Readiness to adapt was aided by the pre-pandemic direction-of-travel towards greater use of digital and telemedicine services. Innovations require robust evaluation to ensure optimisation for public health benefit both in the pandemic and post-pandemic context.

Fields of Study & Subjects

COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction COVID-19 and healthcare impacts Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Publication details

Journal / source
Reproductive Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
22
Issue
S3
Pages
276–276
Publication date
29 January 2026
Language
EN