Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Japanese version of the quality of life assessment in spina bifida for adults

Read full text
Authors: Tae Kawahara, Hitoshi Momose, Yoshifumi Sugita, Konrad M. Szymanski, Eisuke Hida, Akemi Yamazaki
Cited by: 1
References: 42

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida (QUALAS) is a self-administered questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life. The Japanese versions of QUALAS for children and teenagers with spina bifida (SB) have been validated. This study aimed to develop and validate the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of QUALAS-A (QUALAS-A-J), the adult version of the instrument. METHODOLOGY: The participants were adults with SB aged ≥ 18 years. The results of cognitive interviews and a preliminary survey conducted on 16 participants were analyzed to confirm the face and content validity of the responses, and the item wording was modified. The revised questionnaire was administered from April to December 2022. The survey requested responses regarding demographics, QUALAS-A-J, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-26). We then calculated descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients, and conducted exploratory factor analysis and Student's t-test. Cronbach's α and retests were used to determine reliability and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), respectively. RESULTS: Valid responses were received from 133 participants (52% female; mean age, 31.3 ± 10.5 years). Factor analysis indicated a 12-item, three-factor structure. Three items related to sexual activity that had low variance estimates were eliminated. Two factors converged on the same items as the original version; the correlation coefficients for QUALAS-A-J and WHOQOL-26 domains were 0.36 ≤ r ≤ 0.72, which confirmed discriminability for two domains. In all three domains, health-related quality of life was higher for those without than for those with urinary incontinence, validating known-groups validity. Cronbach's α was 0.66-0.88 and the ICCs were > 0.8, thereby confirming reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The present study evaluated the reliability of QUALAS-A-J, which has three domains, 12 items, and two original and one new structure.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
10
Issue
1
Publication date
13 February 2026
Language
EN