“What do you want this information for?”: cognitive interviews with arthritis researchers to inform the development of a health equity-focused demographic survey for outcomes research

Read full text
Authors: Megan Thomas, Niki Oveisi, Charlene Ronquillo, Mark J. Harrison, Cheryl Barnabe, Codie A. Primeau, Juan Antonio Aviña-Zubieta, Anna Samson, Michael Kuluva, Natasha Trehan, Nikki Bhatti, Aniruddha Methi
+1 more Mary A. De Vera
Cited by: 0
References: 31

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arthritis research in Canada has historically lacked focus on equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), as studies show limited reporting of equity-related factors and underrepresentation of participants who are historically from underserved communities. To address this, the objective of this study was to gather feedback from arthritis researchers in Canada to inform the development of a health equity-focused demographic survey for arthritis outcomes research. METHODS: Cognitive interviews were conducted with individuals who (1) have experience conducting arthritis research; (2) reside in and/or conduct their research in Canada; and (3) speak English or French. A demographic survey developed based on the PROGRESS-Plus framework, which includes characteristics that stratify health opportunities and outcomes (Place of residence; Race, culture, ethnicity, language; Occupation; Gender, sex; Religion; Education; Socioeconomic status; Social capital; Plus), was iteratively refined through the ‘think-aloud’ technique where participants provided insights and shared perspectives. Thematic analysis was applied to interview transcripts. RESULTS: Twenty arthritis researchers (11 men) in Canada participated in cognitive interviews. All participants described how the health equity-focused demographic survey was perceived as a feasible and relevant tool. However, some participants expressed concern about questions that focus on perceived sensitive factors (e.g., religion, sexual orientation), while emphasizing there needs to be strong rationale for inclusion to establish patient trust. Three overarching themes were developed: (1) Purpose for collecting demographic data from a health equity lens; (2) Implications of collecting health equity information for data collection, analysis, and interpretation; and (3) Suggestions to enhance survey usability. CONCLUSIONS: A health equity-focused demographic survey developed and refined through cognitive interviews with arthritis researchers may serve as a pragmatic tool to support the integration of EDI in arthritis outcomes research.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Survey Methodology and Nonresponse Cultural Competency in Health Care Health disparities and outcomes

Publication details

Journal / source
BMC Rheumatology
Volume
10
Issue
1
Publication date
12 February 2026
Language
EN