Solving fault-related imaging issues: A case study comparing conventional processing and multiparameter FWI imaging

View at publisher
Authors: Michinori Asaka, Tomohide Ishiyama, Jennifer Badry, K. A. Dancer, James Penwarden
Cited by: 0
References: 14

Abstract

Abstract Seismic imaging of faulted reservoirs presents a challenging task. Faults cause diffractions that need to be preserved, but their multiples (diffracted multiples) must be attenuated without damaging primaries to avoid a noisy image. Additionally, conventional tomography may not adequately model the complex velocity structure caused by faulting. These fault-related imaging issues were addressed in an offshore Western Australian field, covered by a narrow-azimuth streamer data set, using two strategies. First, conventional seismic data reprocessing was performed with careful noise reduction and fault-guided tomography. The noise reduction process included detailed surface-related multiple elimination model generation and mild premigration Radon demultiple. Fault-guided tomography was performed using interpreted faults as a guide for tomography velocity updates. The results showed significant improvements over existing seismic images. Second, a test was performed to leverage multiparameter full-waveform inversion (FWI) using the full unprocessed wavefield, including refractions, multiples, and intact diffractions, to derive a velocity model and FWI-reflectivity for seismic imaging of faulted reservoirs. The results of multiparameter FWI imaging were comparable, if not superior, to the results from the conventional processing using tomography-based velocity and migration, achieving comparable results in a shorter timeframe. These studies suggest that multiparameter FWI imaging has the potential to serve as an alternative solution with quicker turnaround time to conventional processing for accurately imaging faulted reservoirs.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques Seismic Waves and Analysis Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods

Publication details

Journal / source
Interpretation
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
T197–T204
Publication date
4 February 2026
Language
EN