Erdafitinib or Erdafitinib Plus Cetrelimab for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma and FGFR Alterations: Final Results From the Phase II NORSE Study

Read full text
Authors: Yohann Loriot, T. Powles, Victor Moreno, Taek Won Kang, İrfan Çiçin, Angela Girvin, Sydney Akapame, Anne O'Hagan, Wei Zhu, Meggan Tammaro, Shibu Thomas, Spyros Triantos
+1 more Arlene O. Siefker‐Radtke
Cited by: 4
References: 22

Abstract

PURPOSE: -altered mUC. METHODS: alterations who are ineligible for cisplatin were randomly assigned 1:1 in a noncomparative design to once-daily erdafitinib 8 mg (with pharmacodynamically guided uptitration to 9 mg) or erdafitinib 8 mg plus intravenous cetrelimab 240 mg once every 2 weeks at cycles 1-4 and 480 mg once every 4 weeks thereafter. Primary end points were investigator-assessed confirmed overall response rate (ORR) and safety; secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). No statistical hypotheses were tested. RESULTS: At data cutoff, 87 patients were randomly assigned and treated (erdafitinib, n = 43; erdafitinib plus cetrelimab, n = 44). Of 64 patients with PD-L1 expression data, 56 (87.5%) had low levels of PD-L1 expression (combined positive score

Fields of Study & Subjects

Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments Fibroblast Growth Factor Research Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Volume
44
Issue
8
Pages
676–684
Publication date
15 January 2026
Language
EN