Investigation of Profile-Related Evidence Determining Individualized Cancer Therapy (I-PREDICT) N-of-1 Precision Oncology Study: Molecular Profiling to Match Individually Dosed, Personalized Drug Combinations

Read full text
Authors: Jason K. Sicklick, Daisuke Nishizaki, Hirotaka Miyashita, Ryosuke Okamura, Michael E. Hahn, Mina Nikanjam, Paul T. Fanta, David Piccioni, Hitendra Patel, Ramez N. Eskander, Rana R. McKay, Jeffrey S. Ross
+4 more J. Jack Lee, Scott M. Lippman, Shumei Kato, Razelle Kurzrock
Cited by: 9
References: 45

Abstract

PURPOSE Malignancies have complex and distinct molecular profiles that may not segregate by tumor type. However, most precision oncology treatments are matched to a single biomarker. We aimed to optimize therapy for advanced cancers using individually dosed drug regimens customized to cotarget multiple molecular alterations. METHODS Investigation of Profile-Related Evidence Determining Individualized Cancer Therapy (I-PREDICT; NCT02534675 ) is a prospective, investigator-initiated, multidepartment/pan-cancer trial for aggressive advanced/metastatic malignancies. Patients had tissue and/or blood next-generation sequencing (NGS; Foundation Medicine). A molecular tumor board made suggestions. Degree of biomarker matching to drugs given was calculated by a matching score (MS; broadly, number of pathogenic alterations targeted divided by total pathogenic alterations). RESULTS Overall, 210 evaluable patients (n = 456 consented) received ≥1 US Food and Drug Administration–approved drug (mostly off label) after NGS. Median number of pathogenic alterations/tumor was five (range, 0-20); approximately 95% of patients had unique molecular landscapes. Consistent with I-PREDICT's objective to optimize/tailor treatment for each patient, we administered 157 different regimens (including 103 personalized combinations without established safety/dosing data). For previously unstudied combinations, starting doses were reduced and titrated to tolerance (intrapatient dose-finding); only 6.5% experienced Grade 3/4 drug-related toxicities ( v 15.5% of those receiving established regimens). Higher disease control rate (stable disease ≥6 months/objective response), and longer progression-free survival and overall survival correlated significantly/independently/linearly with greater degrees of drug matching to alterations (higher MS), but did not vary by drug number or dosages. CONCLUSION The I-PREDICT strategy of maximizing personalized biomarker matching with individually dosed customized drug combinations enabled safe and active N-of-1 matched treatment, including regimens previously unstudied in Phase I trials. I-PREDICT represents a blueprint for a new personalized precision oncology paradigm, which merits validation via additional prospective trials.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
540–552
Publication date
8 January 2026
Language
EN