International Consensus-Driven Recommendations for Patient-Reported Outcome Research Objectives in Early Phase Dose-Finding Oncology Trials: OPTIMISE-ROR

Read full text
Authors: Emily Alger, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, A. C. Dueck, Anna Minchom, madeline pe, John Devin Peipert, C. J. Snyder, Stefan N. Symeonides, Roger Wilson, Ethan Basch, Yu Qiao, Susan E. Bates
+22 more Helen Bulbeck, Lizzie Dean, Massimo Di Maïo, Aaron R. Hansen, Olga Kholmanskikh, Ken Kobayashi, Dónal Landers, Christophe Le Tourneau, J. Jack Lee, Brigette Ma, Lynley V. Marshall, Sheetal Patel, Joan Petrie, Gregory R. Pond, Kieran Prior, Khadija Rantell, John F. Reeve, O. Solovyeva, Nolan A. Wages, Harald A. Weber, Melanie Calvert, C. Yap
Cited by: 6
References: 63

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is growing scientific interest in incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in early phase dose-finding oncology trials (DFOTs) to assess tolerability, inform dose selection, and guide later stage trial design. However, research indicates that PRO objectives in DFOTs are often unclear. The Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes in Dose-Finding Trials-Research Objectives Recommendations (OPTIMISE-ROR) project was established to support trialists to effectively incorporate PROs into DFOTs. METHODS: Using the Enhancing Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) Network's methodological framework, guideline development included the following: (1) a methodological review of published DFOTs incorporating PROs; (2) candidate item generation, refined through expert consultation; (3) a two-round international multistakeholder Delphi survey (N = 109 in Round 1 [October 2024]; N = 96 in Round 2 [December 2024]); and (4) an independently chaired virtual consensus meeting (N = 31; January 2025) where multidisciplinary, international experts reviewed and voted to finalize items for inclusion. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on six recommendations emphasizing three core PRO tolerability concepts: overall side effect impact, symptomatic adverse events, and overall health-related quality of life. The integration of PROs to inform final dose recommendations in dose escalation and optimization trials should be considered, regardless of trial design. The recommendations highlight the importance of PRO data analysis over time and across dose levels, defining PRO research objectives as descriptive or statistically powered, and assessing PRO-related end points to guide end point selection for subsequent studies. CONCLUSION: This foundational guidance outlines key PRO research objectives in DFOTs. By facilitating the systematic integration of PROs, this guidance supports the utilization of patient-centered evidence for the tolerability and efficacy assessment of therapies to inform dose escalation, optimization, and regulatory evaluation-ultimately contributing to the development of safer, more effective therapies.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cancer survivorship and care Health Systems Economic Evaluations Quality of Life Ethics in Clinical Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Volume
44
Issue
8
Pages
709–719
Publication date
23 January 2026
Language
EN