The neo-epitope-based vaccine OSE2101 with or without pembrolizumab versus best supportive care as maintenance in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients with controlled disease after platinum-based chemotherapy: The academic randomized TEDOVA/GINECO-OV244b/ENGOT-ov58 trial.

Read full text
Authors: A. Leary, Toon Van Gorp, Frederik Marmé, Xavier Paolettí, Lauriane Eberst, Antoine Angelergues, Coriolan Lebreton, Stanislas Quesada, Thibault de la Motte Rouge, Benoit You, Renaud Sabatier, Laura Mansi
+8 more Emilie Kaczmarek, Jerome Alexandre, Thomas Grellety, Pierre Combe, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, Laurence Gladieff, Jean-Sébastien Frenel, Isabelle L. Ray-Coquard
Cited by: 1

Abstract

5510 Background: OSE2101 is a neo-epitope vaccine targeting 5 tumor-associated antigens (TP53, MAGE2, MAGE3, CEA and HER2) modified to increase both HLA-A2 and TCR affinity, designed to turn immunogenic ‘cold’ ovarian cancer (OC) to ‘hot’ tumors. Patients with platinum sensitive OC (PSOC) relapsing post-PARP inhibitor (PARPi) and bevacizumab (BEV) represent an area of unmet medical need. Methods: This international multicenter GINECO-sponsored phase II study randomized PSOC patients in CR, PR, or SD after platinum therapy to best supportive care (BSC, arm A), or maintenance treatment with OSE2101 ((SC, q3w until week 18, then q6w to week 48, then q12w, arm B) or OSE2101+pembrolizumab (IV q6w, Arm C) (1:1:2) for up to 2 years. Eligible pts were HLA-A2 positive and previously treated with, or ineligible for, BEV and a PARPi. Primary endpoint was PFS and randomization was stratified for best response to platinum (CR/PR vs SD). Sample size was calculated to provide 90% power to detect an improved PFS in arm C vs A with HR=0.57. Subsequent hierarchical testing then compared arms C vs B, and arms B vs A. Results: 185 pts were randomized to BSC (N=48), OSE2101 (N=46) or OSE+PEMBRO (N=91). Histology was mainly high grade (93%) and serous (93%), 20% harbored a BRCA1/2 mutation, 51% of pts were in CR/PR and 49% in SD at randomization, 85% and 83% of pts were PARPi and BEV-exposed, respectively. Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. With a median follow up of 22 months, PFS was significantly improved with OSE2101+Pembro vs BSC (4.1 vs 2.8mo in arms C vs A; HR=0.53, 95%CI, 0.36-0.78; p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment PARP inhibition in cancer therapy Immunotherapy and Immune Responses

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Volume
44
Issue
16_suppl
Pages
5510–5510
Publication date
27 May 2026
Language
EN