Prophylactic peptide vaccine targeting resistance mutations in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer: Primary analysis from the ARCHER trial.

View at publisher
Authors: Michael R. Conroy, Yuxuan Wang, Bert Vogelstein, Joseph Christopher Murray, Kristen A. Marrone, Susan Combs Scott, Josephine Louella Feliciano, Christine L. Hann, Christopher J. Thoburn, Aliyah Pabani, Patrick M. Forde, Chen Hu
+8 more Neeha Zaidi, Julie M. Nauroth, Julie Renee Brahmer, Valsamo Anagnostou, Benjamin Philip Levy, Kellie Nicole Smith, Mark M. Yarchoan, Vincent K. Lam
Cited by: 1

Abstract

8517 Background: Acquired resistance to targeted therapy remains a major challenge in ALK-positive NSCLC and is often mediated by mutations in the ALK kinase domain. Prophylactic immune targeting of common ALK resistance mutations represents a novel strategy to delay or prevent the emergence of ALK inhibitor resistance. Methods: We conducted a first-in-human phase 1b clinical trial of a prophylactic peptide vaccine (ALK-Vac) in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients without progression on standard-of-care tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Patients continued their ALK TKI and received ALK-Vac, consisting of synthetic long peptides targeting seven common ALK resistance mutations (I1171T, I1171N, I1171S, L1196M, G1202R, D1203N, E1210K) plus poly-ICLC adjuvant. ALK-Vac was administered subcutaneously on days 1, 4, 8, 15, and 22 (priming) and weeks 12 and 20 (boost). Primary objectives were safety and vaccine-specific T cell responses assessed by IFN-γ ELISpot. Exploratory objectives included molecular and immune-phenotype dynamics assessed by ultrasensitive cell-free DNA (cfDNA) duplex sequencing and CyTOF mass cytometry. Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled and all completed the planned ALK-Vac regimen. Most patients (13/15, 87%) were receiving first-line TKI therapy. Concomitant TKIs included alectinib (7/15, 47%), lorlatinib (5/15, 33%), and brigatinib (3/15, 20%). At enrollment, median TKI duration was 43.7 months (range 4.6-74.2) and 67% of patients had no measurable disease. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were primarily grade 1 (93% of patients); most commonly injection site reactions (93%), fatigue (60%), and flu-like symptoms (40%). No grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were observed. T cell responses (≥2-fold increase in SFU) were detected in 71% (10/14) of evaluable patients, with a median 11.9-fold increase. Responses were observed to G1202R, L1196M, and D1203N (each 10/14, 71%), E1210K (9/14, 64%), and I1171N/S/T (each 7/14, 50%). With a median follow-up of 11.5 months, the disease control rate was 93% (14/15). One patient who achieved robust immune response against multiple resistance mutations developed oligoprogression on alectinib 8.5 months after starting ALK-Vac; molecular profiling of this lesion identified an emergent KRAS G12D mutation without detectable ALK resistance mutation. Conclusions: ALK-Vac was well-tolerated and induced vaccine-specific T cell responses in a minimal residual disease setting, demonstrating feasibility of prophylactic targeting of ALK resistance mutations as an adjunct to TKI therapy and supporting a broader immune-interception framework potentially applicable to other oncogene-driven NSCLC. Comprehensive cfDNA and immune-phenotyping analyses will be reported. Clinical trial information: NCT05950139 .

Fields of Study & Subjects

Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers Lung Cancer Research Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Volume
44
Issue
16_suppl
Pages
8517–8517
Publication date
28 May 2026
Language
EN