Pilot Randomized Trial of Medical Cannabis to Reduce Symptom Burden in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (CanPan)

Read full text
Authors: Dylan Michael Zylla, Ella A. B. Chrenka, Kendall Lin, Grace Gilmore, Jordan Cowger, David J. Rak, Arjun Gupta
Cited by: 1
References: 28

Abstract

PURPOSE Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma frequently experience severe symptoms. Medical cannabis has shown promise for symptom management, yet high-quality data are lacking because of regulatory barriers in conducting cannabis research. Partnering with state cannabis programs may represent a novel pathway to conduct cannabis trials. METHODS We conducted a pilot randomized waitlist-controlled trial of medical cannabis for 32 patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma with ≥1 symptoms in Minnesota. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to early (0-8 weeks) or delayed (9-16 weeks) cannabis intervention (certification, education, provision of cannabis products) through the Minnesota Medical Cannabis Program. The primary study period was 0-8 weeks when only the early arm received the intervention. The primary outcome was feasibility. Secondary outcomes included acceptability, and changes in symptom burden and quality of life examined in exploratory efficacy analyses. RESULTS We enrolled 34 patients, 32 of whom began the study (median age 71 years, 53% women). Patients reported substantial moderate-to-severe baseline symptom burden: insomnia (85%), pain (77%), and appetite loss (69%). The study met prespecified feasibility benchmarks (74% enrollment (goal ≥20%), 81% compliance with arm allocation (goal ≥60%), and 75% patient-reported outcome completion rate [goal ≥50%]). All early arm participants recommended the intervention to others. The median daily tetrahydrocannabinol use was 7.3 mg at 8 weeks. At 8 weeks, early arm patients experienced numerically higher rates of improvement in pain (44% v 20%, P = .35), appetite (56% v 30%, P = .37), and insomnia (67% v 30%, P = .18), and lower rates of worsening cannabis-related harms (eg, dry mouth [11% v 20%, P = .99]). CONCLUSION We demonstrate a model collaboration between investigators and a state cannabis program to overcome regulatory barriers to conducting interventional cannabis research. The encouraging preliminary efficacy and safety of cannabis in managing symptoms supports further exploration.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Publication details

Journal / source
JCO Oncology Practice
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Pages
OP2501165–OP2501165
Publication date
9 January 2026
Language
EN