Genome sequencing identifies monogenic causes in adults with metabolic diseases

Read full text
Authors: Volkan Okur, Amanda Halstrom, John N. Falcone, Maurice A. Hurd, Sarah Stewart, Katerine Claudio, Jyothi Manohar, Fana Dealla, Sonal Rajesh Kumar, Michele Yeung, Gregory F. Dakin, Omar E. Bellorin-Marin
+26 more Cheguevara I. Afaneh, Lisa Cooper Hudgins, Esther Wei, Laura F. Gingras, Alexandra King, Judy Tung, Atteeq Ur Rehman, Amanda Thomas‐Wilson, Saurav Guha, Avinash Abhyankar, Ashley Wilson, Shahid Y. Khan, Sowmya Thirumalai Srinivasa, Shruti Phadke, Priya Krithivasan, Caroline Nava, Shuibing Chen, Ryan S. Smith, Theresa Y. MacDonald, Megan J. Ritter, Laura C. Alonso, Olivier Elemento, Miriam S. Udler, Jessica M. Peña, Vaidehi Jobanputra, Marcus DaSilva Goncalves
Cited by: 0
References: 18

Abstract

Context: A subset of metabolic diseases is caused by rare monogenic variants. Next-generation sequencing offers a promising approach for identifying such variants, but its application in clinical diagnostics for metabolic disease is limited and the diagnostic yield is unknown. Objective: To determine the diagnostic yield of clinical genome sequencing (GS) in adults presenting with common metabolic diseases. Methods: We performed clinical GS on 560 adults seen in New York clinical practices between August 2020 and December 2023. Participants presented with hyperlipidemia/hypertriglyceridemia (HLD/HTG), pre-diabetes, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and/or metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease/steatohepatitis (MAFLD/MASH). Variants in a curated set of 90 genes associated with monogenic forms of these conditions were classified as Pathogenic (P), Likely Pathogenic (LP), or Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) using ACMG/ClinGen guidelines. P/LP variants in ACMG secondary findings (v3.1) genes were also reported with participant consent. Results: The cohort had a female-to-male ratio of 1.7, with 18.6% African American and 22.6% Latino participants. The most common enrollment diagnoses were HLD/HTG (25%), T2DM (9%), pre-diabetes (7%), and MAFLD/MASH (4%). Many participants had multiple conditions (42% with two, 12% with three). Approximately one-third had reportable variants, with 6% classified as P/LP. The most common P/LP variants were in APOB and LDLR. Conclusion: The prevalence of clinically significant (P/LP) variants related to primary metabolic disease in this cohort was 6%. An additional 5.5% of participants had P/LP variants in ACMG secondary findings genes. Future studies should refine participant selection for genome sequencing to optimize its diagnostic and clinical value.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Genomics and Rare Diseases Genetic Associations and Epidemiology Lipid metabolism and disorders

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
bvag091–bvag091
Publication date
9 April 2026
Language
EN