Education Research: Entrustable Professional Activities for General Neurology Advanced Practice Providers

Read full text
Authors: Daniel S. Harrison, Elyse M. Doherty, Cassandra C. Meffert, C Doughty, Joel C. Morgenlander, The Entrustable Professional Activities for General Neurology APPs (EPAGNA) Study Group, Shannon L. Anderson, Jennifer Cheng, Calli Cook, Salvador Cruz-Flores, John S. Emmett, John Engstrom
+24 more Miriam Freimer, Scott Friedenberg, Gwen Garden, Julia Gray, Julie A. Gurwell, Allyson Hamacher, Jason Johns, Keri Johnson, Chaouki Khoury, Alexander King, Pearce Korb, Ashley Lengel, Terri Milburn, Jamelah A. Morton, Darcy O'Banion, Victoria S. Pelak, Amy Perrin Ross, Aashit Shah, Gretchen E. Tietjen, Karen Tillotson, Andrea H. Thurler, Diego R. Torres-Russotto, Juliana H. VanderPluym, Brannon Vines
Cited by: 2
References: 25

Abstract

Background and Objectives: A dedicated didactic framework, assessment strategy, and consensus expectations for advanced practice providers (APPs) entering general neurology practice for the first time have not been described. We aimed to define entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for general neurology APPs and to provide further validity evidence for the EPAs through application of the EQual rubric. Methods: This was a modified Delphi consensus process. Panelists were leaders of neurology APP fellowship programs and other established experts in neurology APP education. The steering committee identified putative EPA topics. Panelists voted on a 5-point Likert scale how important it was that a new general neurology APP be able to perform specific activities with indirect supervision remotely available by the end of their on-the-job training. Panelists were allowed to propose modifications to putative EPAs and suggest new EPAs. After 3 rounds of voting, full EPA descriptions were drafted by the steering committee. Full EPA descriptions were sent to external experts in neurology APP education for assessment of their structure and quality. The steering committee met again to discuss feedback from the external experts and make adjustments as needed. The full EPA descriptions were sent to the Delphi panelists for a final round of voting. Results: = 0.005). Discussion: These consensus EPAs may be applied for curricular development and assessment for new general neurology APPs. Entrustment expectations did not differ between those who were leaders in fellowship programs and those who were not.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Neurology and Historical Studies Innovations in Medical Education Diversity and Career in Medicine

Publication details

Journal / source
Neurology Education
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
e200292–e200292
Publication date
8 January 2026
Language
EN