Outcomes After Minor Ischemic Stroke in Older Patients Treated With IV Thrombolysis vs Standard of Care in the TEMPO-2 Trial

View at publisher
Authors: Aravind Ganesh, Shabnam Vatanpour, Amy Ying Xin Yu, Philip Barber, Philip Man Chiu Choi, Thalia Shoshana Field, Mahesh Pundlik Kate, Timothy John Kleinig, Michel Christopher Frank Shamy, Kausik Chatterjee, Carlos A. Molina, Bruce C.V. Campbell
+5 more Ramana Appireddy, Keith W. Muir, Michael D. Hill, Shelagh B. Coutts, as the TEMPO-2 investigators
Cited by: 1
References: 30

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are few high-quality data on thrombolysis outcomes in the oldest patients, especially for minor stroke. We examined safety and efficacy outcomes of thrombolysis in patients older than 80 years, compared with those ≤80 years, in the Tenecteplase Versus Standard of care for Minor Ischaemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion (TEMPO-2) trial. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of the TEMPO-2 randomized controlled trial, we compared outcomes and adverse events in patients with minor stroke and symptomatic intracranial occlusion or focal perfusion lesion within 12 hours of symptom onset, assigned to tenecteplase vs nonthrombolytic standard of care, in those >80 years and ≤80 years. The primary outcome was responder analysis of the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (responder was mRS = 0-1 if premorbid mRS = 0-1, 0-2 if premorbid mRS = 2). Secondary outcomes included neurologic recovery according to the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 5 days/discharge, vessel recanalization, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), and adverse events. We used mixed-effects Poisson, ordinal logistic, and quantile regression as appropriate, adjusted for sex, baseline NIHSS, and treatment assignment as fixed-effects and enrolling site as random effects. RESULTS: = 0.026). DISCUSSION: Older patients (>80 years) with minor stroke and visible occlusion or perfusion lesion assigned to tenecteplase were more likely to achieve recanalization of occlusions and short-term neurologic recovery, as were younger patients, but they experienced worse 90-day outcomes with more frequent hemorrhagic and stroke progression/recurrence-related SAEs. Overall, these results, while post hoc, do not support thrombolysis for minor strokes in older patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02398656. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that in patients >80 years with minor stroke and visible occlusion or perfusion lesion, IV thrombolysis with tenecteplase is associated with worse functional outcomes at 90 days compared with nonthrombolytic standard of care therapies.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Acute Ischemic Stroke Management Neurological Disorders and Treatments Acute Myocardial Infarction Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Neurology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
106
Issue
9
Pages
e214925–e214925
Publication date
14 April 2026
Language
EN