IV Thrombolysis in the Extended Time Window for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Read full text
Authors: Lina Palaiodimou, Nikolaos M. Papageorgiou, Michele Romoli, Aikaterini Theodorou, Maria‐Ioanna Stefanou, Robin Lemmens, Amrou Sarraj, Andrei V. Alexandrov, Guillaume Turc, Urs Fischer, Georgios K. Tsivgoulis
Cited by: 1
References: 43

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: IV thrombolysis (IVT) is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, yet many patients present beyond this window. Recent randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and updated guidelines suggest potential benefit of IVT in selected patients treated in the extended time window, but the overall evidence remains evolving. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVT beyond 4.5 hours from last known well. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov for RCTs and individual patient data meta-analyses of RCTs comparing IVT plus best medical therapy (BMT) with BMT alone in patients with AIS presenting more than 4.5 hours after last known well. The primary efficacy outcome was excellent functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-1). Secondary efficacy outcomes included good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) and reduced disability (≥1-point shift across the mRS). The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH); secondary safety outcomes were any ICH and all-cause mortality at 90 days. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed according to thrombolytic agent, treatment window, imaging selection strategy, vascular territory, and administration of endovascular treatment. Trial sequential analysis was conducted for the primary outcome to evaluate the robustness of the cumulative evidence. RESULTS: = 0%; NNH = 75). The rates of any ICH and all-cause mortality were similar between the 2 groups. No significant subgroup differences were documented across different subgroups. Trial sequential analysis confirmed that the cumulative evidence for the primary outcome crossed the efficacy boundary, supporting a robust treatment effect. DISCUSSION: IVT in the extended time window was associated with improved functional outcomes without increased mortality, supporting its use in selected patients despite a higher rate of sICH. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: The prespecified protocol of the present systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews (registration ID: CRD420261330511).

Fields of Study & Subjects

Acute Ischemic Stroke Management Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms Neurological Disorders and Treatments

Publication details

Journal / source
Neurology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
e218294–e218294
Publication date
23 July 2026
Language
EN