Zero-Sum Thinking and the Roots of US Political Differences

Read full text
Authors: Sahil Chinoy, Nathan Nunn, Sandra Sequeira, Stefanie Stantcheva
Cited by: 8
References: 58

Abstract

We investigate the origins and implications of zero-sum thinking: the belief that gains for one individual or group tend to come at the cost of others. Using a new survey of 20,400 US residents, we measure zero-sum thinking, political preferences, policy views, and a rich array of ancestral information spanning four generations. We find that a more zero-sum mindset is strongly associated with more support for government redistribution, race- and gender-based affirmative action, and more restrictive immigration policies. Zero-sum thinking can be traced back to the experiences of both the individual and their ancestors, encompassing factors such as the degree of intergenerational upward mobility they experienced, whether they immigrated to the United States or lived in a location with more immigrants, and whether they were enslaved or lived in a location with more enslavement. (JEL C83, D72, D91, H23, J15, J16, Z13)

Fields of Study & Subjects

Culture Economy and Development Studies Social and Intergroup Psychology Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
American Economic Review
Publisher
American Economic Association
Volume
116
Issue
3
Pages
1052–1096
Publication date
27 February 2026
Language
EN