Complications of Alloplastic Graft Materials Used in Cranioplasty: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Read full text
Authors: Abdulaziz Fahad Samandar, Muna F. Alnaim, Sarah Qari, Jawahir Omar AlTamimi, Kausar Ahmed, Faris Alharbi, Abdulrahman Alhazmi, Eyad E Sindi, Houriah Yasir Nukaly, Raghad Abdullah Selate, Hatem Abdulmoamen Alnoman
Cited by: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND Autologous bone grafts are commonly associated with higher complication rates than alloplastic materials in cranioplasty. While previous systematic reviews have shown favorable outcomes with alloplastic grafts, there is limited comparative data on the performance of different alloplastic materials. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy of alloplastic materials used in cranioplasty, focusing on complications, re-surgery, and implant exposure. MATERIAL AND METHODS Following PRISMA and PRISMA for network meta-analyses (NMA), we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 2015-January 2025). Eligibility criteria were adult cranioplasty cohorts comparing 2 or more alloplastic materials and reporting at least 1 pre-specified outcome: infection, overall complications, implant exposure, or re-surgery. Data extracted a priori included study design, indication, implant material (polyetheretherketone, titanium, hydroxyapatite, polymethylmethacrylate [porous and hard], ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene), follow-up, and event counts per outcome. Random-effects models estimated pooled effects; NMA generated P-scores/SUCRA ranks. Heterogeneity (I²), transitivity, and incoherence were assessed. Risk of bias was measured with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS From 1025 studies, 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. The highest complication rates were reported for polymethylmethacrylate, hydroxyapatite, and titanium, although differences were not statistically significant. SUCRA rankings suggested the lowest infection rates with polyetheretherketone and titanium. Meta-regression indicated that polymethylmethacrylate was associated with higher incidence of infection. Network analysis showed titanium had maximum implant exposure. Polymethylmethacrylate (P-score=0.79) and hydroxyapatite (P-score=0.73) carried the highest re-surgery risks. CONCLUSIONS Polymethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite were associated with higher infection and re-surgery rates, while titanium showed greater implant exposure.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances Facial Trauma and Fracture Management Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Medical Science Monitor
Publisher
International Scientific Information, Inc.
Volume
32
Pages
e950551–e950551
Publication date
15 January 2026
Language
EN