Bridging Artificial and Human Intelligence: Comparative Performance of AI Models and Neurologists in Stroke Recognition- A Cross-Sectional Study

Read full text
Authors: Kaleem Basharat, Doaa Sabir, Yavuz Yiğit, Ahmed Abdu Obeid Kassem, Kamal Majed
Cited by: 1
References: 18

Abstract

Background Stroke is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide. Thus, early detection and intervention, along with appropriate triage, are crucial. The development of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and Gemini, presents new potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare, including clinical decision support. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and quality of triage recommendations from leading LLMs compared to those from board-certified neurologists in patients with suspected acute stroke. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of 200 posts in the Reddit “AskDocs” section related to possible symptoms of stroke. These posts elicited responses from two LLMs, ChatGPT-4 and Gemini, as well as two board-certified neurologists. Two experienced emergency medicine specialists, who were independent of the survey, evaluated responses for three criteria online using 7-point Likert scales: Ease of Understanding, Scientific Adequacy and Overall Satisfaction. The outcome of interest was advising an Emergency Department (ED) visit. Results Neurologists were much more willing to advocate for visiting the ED (58.5%) than ChatGPT (45%) or Gemini (45%) (p < 0.001). Second, AI models often gave “Unable to determine” response (ChatGPT: 11.5%, Gemini: 14.5%), which was not reported by the neurologists (0%). Regarding quality, neurologist responses were rated highest for Ease of Understanding (Median 7) and Overall Satisfaction (Median 7) (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Notably, the ChatGPT’s adequacy was rated significantly higher (focus group: Median 6 vs. neurologists: Median 5, p < 0.01), although the levels of Gemini’s scientific adequacy did not differ from those of neurologists (Median 5 vs. 5, p = 0.14). Conclusion LLMs showed strong scientific adequacy and good clarity of presentation; however, their conservative triage strategy raises important patient safety concerns in time-sensitive neurological emergencies such as stroke.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Acute Ischemic Stroke Management Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Publication details

Journal / source
F1000Research
Publisher
F1000 Research Ltd
Volume
15
Pages
1128–1128
Publication date
10 July 2026
Language
EN