Negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional debridement in subcutaneous abdominal wound healing in obese patients following obstetric/gynaecologic surgery

View at publisher
Authors: Ozan Karadeniz, Osman Murat Güler, Bugra Tunc, Mustafa Göksu
Cited by: 2
References: 45

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of negative pressure wound therapy plus debridement (NPWT+D) compared to conventional debridement (CD) in cases of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment (SAWHI) following obstetric and gynaecological surgery. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study examined data from patients with obesity (body mass index ≥30kg/m²) who experienced SAWHI after surgical site infections following obstetric and gynaecological procedures. Patients were divided into two groups according to treatment methods: the control group received standard care with debridement alone (CD group), while the remainder received NPWT+D (NPWT+D group). Data were collected from patient medical records, focusing on: demographic factors; comorbidities; wound characteristics; perioperative data; wound healing; hospital stay; intravenous treatment; infection rates; and dressing counts. RESULTS: The data of 103 patients were reviewed. The NPWT+D group (n=50) demonstrated shorter wound healing times than the CD group (n=53) (11.3±4.2 days versus 14.9±6.4 days, respectively; p=0.004) and markedly fewer debridement sessions (3.7±1.5 versus 14.5±5.9, respectively; p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Surgical site infection prevention Abdominal Surgery and Complications Wound Healing and Treatments

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Wound Care
Publisher
Mark Allen Group
Volume
35
Issue
Sup4a
Pages
S18–S26
Publication date
1 April 2026
Language
EN