Superior compared with anteroinferior plating for mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle

View at publisher
Authors: Marc Boutros, Guy Awad, Akin A. Adio, Jad Lawand, Peter Boufadel, Adam Z Khan, Brian W. Hill, John G Horneff, Joseph A Abboud
Cited by: 1
References: 57

Abstract

Aims: Superior plating has long been the routine surgical approach for mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle. However, concerns about the prominence of the plate and neurological risk have led to an increased interest in anteroinferior plating. Whether anteroinferior plating offers comparable or improved outcomes without compromising the stability of fixation has been investigated in several studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, complications, and complication-related outcomes following superior compared with anteroinferior plating of mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar until 22 August 2025. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing superior and anteroinferior plating techniques for mid-shaft clavicular fractures in adults were included. A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 1,433 adult patients with these fractures. The outcomes which were assessed included the Constant-Murley score (shoulder function), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, neurological injury, implant removal, postoperative pain (visual analogue scale), time to union, the rates of nonunion and infection, and operating time. Results: Anteroinferior plating yielded significantly higher Constant-Murley scores compared with superior plating (mean difference -1.91 (95% CI -3.25 to -0.57); p = 0.005). Anteroinferior plating was also associated with a significantly lower risk of minor neurological injury compared with superior plating, with a risk ratio of 3.69 (95% CI 1.03 to 13.25; p = 0.050). There were no significant differences in the mean DASH score (p = 0.110), implant removal (p = 0.350), postoperative pain (p = 0.620), nonunion rate (p = 0.250), infection rate (p = 0.600), time to union (p = 0.520), or operating time (p = 0.580) between the groups. Conclusion: Anteroinferior plating provides significantly better shoulder function with a significantly reduced risk of minor neurological injury compared with traditional superior plating. These findings support the growing adoption of anteroinferior plating as a safe and effective alternative for the surgical treatment of mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries Shoulder Injury and Treatment Hip and Femur Fractures

Publication details

Journal / source
The Bone & Joint Journal
Publisher
British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
Volume
108-B
Issue
5
Pages
578–587
Publication date
1 May 2026
Language
EN