Rivista di Studi Sudasiatici - contenuto non piu disponibile

Read full text
Authors: Kei Kataoka
Cited by: 0

Abstract

In the Mīmāṃsā tradition, man-made statements, in contrast to perception or Vedic injunctions, are not ultimately counted as primary sources of information. Kumārila inherits Śabara’s idea that man-made speech can convey only a speaker’s cognition (vaktṛjñāna) and not the actual object in question. Thus the essential part of Dharmakīrti’s view on speech as being vaktrabhiprāyasūcaka is already found in the Śābarabhāṣya. It is more appropriate to say that Dharmakīrti’s idea of vaktrabhiprāyasūcaka was prefigured by Kumārila or some other Mīmāṃsakas than to say that Dharmakīrti invented it building on Dignāga’s apoha theory.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Indian and Buddhist Studies

Publication details

Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
39–55
Publication date
8 July 2026
Language
EN