“Who the hell is upstream pushing them all in?” Reclaiming public health’s defining metaphor to counter the commercial determinants of health

Read full text
Authors: May C. I. van Schalkwyk, Benjamin Hawkins, Jeff Collin, Mark Petticrew
Cited by: 2
References: 39

Abstract

Public health policy and practice are often described by means of a metaphor that depicts interventions as "upstream" efforts to prevent people from falling into a river, from which they must be rescued "downstream" by overwhelmed healthcare services. The upstream-downstream metaphor has been described as public health's defining metaphor. We apply a commercial determinants of health lens to re-engage with the initial intentions of McKinlay's seminal 1975 essay from which this metaphor emerged, and to critique its current uses. We examine how the upstream-downstream metaphor has come to be used in ways that depart radically from its original intent, which was to characterise the practices of powerful commercial actors who profit from the production of harm and disease. The subtle but important shift in language from people being pushed, to falling into the river, among other depoliticising processes, contributes to an individualising and victim-blaming approach to health harms, deflecting from the role of commercial power and practices. There is a pressing need to reclaim public health's defining metaphor as part of the wider agenda to address commercial determinants as the major public health challenges of our time.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology Public Health Policies and Education Global Security and Public Health

Publication details

Journal / source
PLOS Global Public Health
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
e0006045–e0006045
Publication date
27 February 2026
Language
EN