Driving factors in pediatric emergency department use: an ecological retrospective study

Read full text
Authors: Denis Mongin, Hervé Spechbach, Joachim Marti, Frédéric Ehrler, Johan Nicolas Siebert
Cited by: 0
References: 32

Abstract

Abstract Background Pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) often face high volumes of low-acuity visits, reflecting gaps in primary care access and socio-economic disparities. We investigated how neighborhood socio-economic vulnerability, pediatrician availability, and proximity to the PED jointly influence PED utilization in Geneva, Switzerland. Methods In this retrospective ecological study (Jan 2023-Dec 2024), we aggregated all PED visits for children aged 0-16 years by neighborhood and Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) level. Neighborhood visit incidence (unique patients per child population) was modeled using mixed-effects regression against a composite socio-economic vulnerability index (NSVI), pediatrician density within a 2 km radius, and distance to the PED, incorporating an exponential decay function for distance and postal code as a random intercept. Results There were 68,482 PED visits by 35,994 children (35.1% of Geneva under-16 population). Low-acuity visits (CTAS 4-5) comprised ∼50% of encounters. Both distance and socio-economic vulnerability showed clear dose-response relationships, with stronger effects observed for lower-acuity visits, and no interaction effect between them. Overall, proximity accounted for up to 20.8% of non-urgent PED use, while neighborhood socio-economic vulnerability explained up to 19.7% of low acuity visits across Geneva. Pediatrician density showed a modest inverse association for low-acuity visits only. Conclusions Both proximity and socio-economic vulnerability are independent determinants of non-urgent PED use. Policies focusing only on primary care access risk missing key drivers of PED use, highlighting the need for locally tailored strategies such as community outreach near hospitals or programs to strengthen health literacy among families. Summary Proximity and socio-economic vulnerability each explain up to 20% of non-urgent pediatric emergency visits, highlighting major contextual drivers of avoidable care use. What’s Known on This Subject Pediatric emergency department crowding, often driven by low-acuity visits, has been linked to socio-economic disadvantage, poor primary care access, and proximity. Yet, few studies have jointly examined these factors or compared their impact within a universal healthcare setting. What This Study Adds This study disentangles the effects of distance, socio-economic vulnerability, and pediatrician density on PED use. Proximity and disadvantage each explain ∼20% of low-acuity visits, while pediatrician density has limited impact, highlighting the need for targeted, locally adapted interventions.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Emergency and Acute Care Studies Healthcare Policy and Management Child and Adolescent Health

Publication details

Journal / source
PLoS ONE
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
e0344153–e0344153
Publication date
28 May 2026
Language
EN