Clinical efficacy of joint mobilization for shoulder impingement syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Read full text
Authors: G H Lee, 우현준, Yunhee Han, Seungkwan Choi, JungHo Jo, Junghan Lee, Seojae Jeon, Won-Bae Ha
Cited by: 1
References: 30

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No systematic review has examined the clinical effectiveness of mobilization for shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS). We aimed to evaluate clinical effectiveness for the use of mobilization in SIS. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published up to April 30, 2023. Randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of mobilization for SIS were included. Literature was extracted using Endnote 20, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2.0. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4. This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Nineteen randomized controlled trials (956 participants) were selected based on the inclusion criteria. Adding mobilization to traditional physical therapy reduced pain (mean difference [MD]=1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91 to 2.53, I2 = 97%, p < 0.00001), increased active range of motion (MD = 14.49, 95% CI: 8.46 to 20.53, I2 = 95%, p < 0.00001), and improved the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (MD = 5.95, 95% CI: 0.01 to 11.90, p = 0.05) and Constant-Murley scores (MD = 5.49, 95% CI: 0.78 to 10.19, p = 0.02). Joint mobilization was more effective in reducing pain (MD = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.15 to 1.19, p = 0.01) and increasing active range of motion (MD = 8.56, 95% CI: 2.31 to 14.82, p = 0.007) compared with sham mobilization. No statistically significant differences were found between physical therapy plus mobilization and physical therapy plus exercise. CONCLUSION: Mobilization may offer adjunctive, short-term benefits in improving the clinical symptoms of SIS when added to conventional treatments. Future studies should focus on evaluating the effects of mobilization as a stand-alone intervention, incorporate larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up, and conduct high-quality comparative trials to identify the most effective specific mobilization techniques.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Shoulder Injury and Treatment Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment Sports injuries and prevention

Publication details

Journal / source
PLoS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
e0352260–e0352260
Publication date
13 July 2026
Language
EN