α-Gal Syndrome in the South: Why We Need Treatment Trials, Not Just Tick Prevention

View at publisher
Authors: Benjamin W. Casterline, Christine Franzese, Yoonseong Park, Jane A. McElroy
Cited by: 1
References: 20

Abstract

), ubiquitous across the region, transmits AGS sensitization, making reexposure nearly inevitable for outdoor workers and residents. Current management relies on dietary avoidance of mammalian products of an indeterminant length, a recommendation that is neither practical in a region where mammalian meat is central to cuisine and culture nor evidence based regarding duration or necessity. In the absence of treatment options, patients are turning to alternative interventions such as acupuncture protocols that lack validation from controlled trials. Meanwhile, oral immunotherapy has demonstrated safety and efficacy for other immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergies, and individual case reports suggest desensitization may be feasible for AGS syndrome. The US South, with its high disease burden, clinical expertise, and patient populations, is uniquely positioned to lead the rigorous phase 1 and phase 2 trials needed to develop evidence-based treatment alternatives. Without such research, patients have only dietary restriction as an evidence-based option and may seek purported treatments that lack rigorous validation.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Vector-borne infectious diseases Xenotransplantation and immune response Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Southern Medical Journal
Publisher
Southern Medical Association
Volume
119
Issue
6
Pages
328–332
Publication date
1 June 2026
Language
EN