Dental Composite Offers Comparable or Greater Pullout and Shear Strength to Lateral Mass Screw Fixation in a Human Cadaveric Model

Read full text
Authors: Harsh Wadhwa, Javier Castro, Olivia Okoli, Calvin Chan, Somayeh H. Ahmad, Anna Karnowska, Serena S. Hu, Jayme C.B. Koltsov, Karl C. Bruckman, James M. Mok
Cited by: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lateral mass screw fixation is the common method of fixation for an instrumented posterior fusion of the subaxial cervical spine. While screws have established efficacy, adhesive material that can be applied to the bony surface may be a promising alternative strategy owing to ease of application, size, and avoidance of screw loosening, malposition, or fracture. METHODS: tests with a 2-sided level of significance of α = 0.05. RESULTS: = 0.7). The composite failure mechanism under shear loading for half of the specimens was composite separation from bone, whereas the rest failed due to fractures distant from the composite site, indicating robust fixation integrity of composite to bone. CONCLUSIONS: Dental composite displayed similar shear strength and greater pullout strength compared with lateral mass screws. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An adhesion-based fixation strategy may serve as a viable alternative to traditional screws in specific clinical scenarios that are worthy of further investigation.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Facial Trauma and Fracture Management Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Bone fractures and treatments

Publication details

Journal / source
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Publisher
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
591–597
Publication date
3 April 2026
Language
EN