Pilot demonstration for physician compensation incentives to improve diagnostic specificity in clinical documentation

View at publisher
Authors: David S. Burstein, Nathaniel Schwartz, Abhiroop Ganguly, Michael A. Hanak, Laura J. Zimmermann, Ali Keshavarzian
Cited by: 0
References: 46

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Omissions in clinical documentation hinder diagnosis by obscuring important information and delaying communication among clinicians. Additionally, carefully implemented incentives can improve health care processes such as clinical documentation. Therefore, we created a pilot using $20,000 in compensation incentives to improve free text documentation for six common outpatient diagnoses (cerebrovascular accidents, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and smoking) in an urban health system. METHODS: For each diagnosis, we asked clinicians to document 2-3 pre-specified clinically significant, evidence-based details that influence diagnosis or management. We compared baseline documentation (Aug 15th-Sep 25th, 2022) with an incentivized period (Sep 26th-Dec 16th, 2022) using an unadjusted signed rank test and an adjusted generalized linear mixed model. All 32 eligible physicians and advanced practice providers participated. RESULTS: Among 693 baseline and 1,494 intervention opportunities when a diagnosis was assessed, documentation that included all clinically significant details improved from mean 32.2 % (SD 20.7) to mean 47.1 % (SD 23.6; p=0.01) and in our adjusted analysis from 35.6 to 48.2 % (p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Electronic Health Records Systems Medical Coding and Health Information Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Publication details

Journal / source
Diagnosis
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
419–429
Publication date
4 March 2026
Language
EN