Patterns of diagnostic errors using hierarchical cluster analysis: a single-center, cross-sectional study in general internal medicine

View at publisher
Authors: Yuya Suzuki, Toshinori Nishizawa, Hiroki Ozawa, Yukinori Harada, Takashi Watari, Taro Shimizu, Madoka Sakurai, Kuniyoshi Hayashi, Yasuhiro Osugi, Gautam Anil Deshpande, Hiroko Arioka
Cited by: 1
References: 46

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic errors are caused by disease complexity, variable settings in which care is provided, and multiple cognitive and system-level factors. However, whether outpatient diagnostic errors aggregate into specific failure modes that align with the clinical context remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to explore these modes by examining the salient causes of unexpected readmission. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to analyze unexpected readmissions among outpatients in general internal medicine who visited a clinic within 14 days of their initial visit. Two physicians independently assessed the diagnostic errors using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument and Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy. We applied hierarchical clustering to the DEER taxonomy and conducted Fisher's exact tests to examine the associations with patient, physician, and system factors (presence of a referral letter, personal protective equipment [PPE] use, and late session). RESULTS: Among the 146 patients, 50 (34.2 %) experienced diagnostic errors. Cluster analysis revealed two main categories of failure modes: (1) diagnostic prioritization and urgency appraisal failure, and (2) information acquisition and synthesis failure. The latter category was further divided into three clinically relevant subtypes: data-gathering failure, where PPE use was more common; information synthesis and interpretation failure, in which referral letters were more common; and undertesting and safety-netting failure. CONCLUSIONS: We identified that diagnostic errors were divided into four diagnostic failure modes that mapped to distinct DEER failure patterns and other factors. Linking these failure modes to measurable contextual variables may provide targets for diagnostic safety programs.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills Patient Safety and Medication Errors Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues

Publication details

Journal / source
Diagnosis
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
224–237
Publication date
27 April 2026
Language
EN