The is-ought problem in deciding what to replicate: Which motives guide current replication practices?

This commentary examines whether the motives that currently guide replication practices align with normative proposals for selecting replication targets. Drawing on the preliminary analysis of 1,075 replication studies in psychology, we find that researchers most often conduct replications to self-replicate, extend previous findings, or test their generalizability, whereas motives related to a study’s influence or uncertainty are mentioned less frequently. These findings suggest a discrepancy between what researchers do replicate and what meta-scientific frameworks recommend should be replicated, highlighting the continued influence of novelty-oriented incentives even within the replication landscape.