Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Pre-treatment NLR, PLR, LMR, and SII do not predict pathological complete response or residual cancer burden

Read full text
Authors: İsmail Zihni, Mehmet Zafer Sabuncuoğlu, Burcu Zihni, Ebru Özan Sanhal, Veli Vural, Cumhur Arici
Cited by: 1

Abstract

Inflammation-based indices, derived from routine complete blood count parameters such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), have garnered considerable attention as potential prognostic markers for treatment response in breast cancer. Nevertheless, their predictive utility in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remains equivocal. This study aimed to investigate the association between pre-treatment inflammatory indices and pathological complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB) in breast cancer patients receiving NACT. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 110 consecutive patients with invasive breast carcinoma who received NACT followed by curative surgery at a single institution. Pre-treatment values for NLR, PLR, LMR, and SII were calculated from routine laboratory data. Given the non-normal distribution of inflammatory indices, as determined by Shapiro-Wilk testing, non-parametric analyses were employed. Group comparisons utilized the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Predictive performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with 500-iteration bootstrap resampling. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to identify independent predictors of pCR. The findings revealed no significant associations between any of the inflammatory indices and pCR or RCB class distribution. ROC analyses indicated poor discriminatory performance for all indices, with area under the curve (AUC) values consistently approximating 0.50. In the multivariable analysis, only Ki-67 ≥14% independently predicted pCR (OR 7.077, 95% CI 2.210-22.662; p=0.001). In conclusion, pre-treatment NLR, PLR, LMR, and SII did not exhibit clinically meaningful predictive value for pathological response to NACT within this cohort. Tumor proliferative activity, as reflected by Ki-67, remained the most robust independent predictor of treatment response.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis

Publication details

Journal / source
Biomolecules and Biomedicine
Publisher
Association of Basic Medical Sciences of FBIH
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
2347–2359
Publication date
23 June 2026
Language
EN