A critical analysis of Zimbabwe’s non-implementation of constitutional injunctions on devolution

Read full text
Authors: Paul Mudau
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Zimbabwe’s 2013 Constitution provides for a multi-level system of government whereby the government is constituted at national, provincial and local levels. Despite the new Constitution being relatively comprehensive about the devolution of powers to the subnational levels of government, the country is still trapped within the post-independence highly centralised unitary state design. Although the new Constitution was adopted in 2013, devolution has not yet been fully implemented in Zimbabwe. This non-implementation of the constitutional injunctions on devolution, almost a decade after the promulgation of the Constitution, brings into question the country’s commitment to the devolution of powers and constitutionalism. This article critiques this state of affairs, and identifies the politico-legal factors responsible for the country’s non-implementation of the constitutional injunctions on the devolution of powers to subnational levels of government. This article’s central thesis is that the full devolution of powers is one of the significant levers of constitutional transformation in Zimbabwe.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Political Systems and Governance Legal Issues in South Africa Local Government Finance and Decentralization

Publication details

Journal / source
Open Science Framework
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN