Biophysical Management in Physical Labor Environments: Automatism, Coherence, and the Neurobiological Failure of Efficiency-Penalizing Compensation Structures. A Qualitative Case Study — Arvato Logistics, Netherlands (2025)

Read full text
Authors: Carlos Jose Perez Pulido
Cited by: 1

Abstract

This working paper introduces Biophysical Management (BPM), a framework derived from the ISHEA Δ±1 Coherence Framework, and applies it to direct field observation in a high-volume logistics warehouse operated by Arvato in the Netherlands. Seven propositions are developed linking motor automatism, metabolic coherence, psychological safety, structured recovery, cross-role rotation, and participatory feedback to sustainable productivity in physical labor contexts. The paper's central and original contribution is the identification of a structural neurobiological failure in prevailing logistics compensation models: when efficient workers are penalized through reduced working hours upon early task completion, the dopaminergic reward circuit is systematically suppressed. Drawing on Skinner (1938), Schultz et al. (1997), Deci & Ryan (1985), and Kahneman & Tversky (1979), the paper demonstrates that efficiency-penalizing compensation structures extinguish productive behavior with neurobiological certainty — producing the performance degradation operators attribute to worker attitude or culture. The study is qualitative, exploratory, and hypothesis-generating, intended as a foundation for future empirical investigation with biometric instrumentation and quantitative productivity analysis.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation Human-Automation Interaction and Safety Workplace Health and Well-being

Publication details

Publication date
1 January 2026
Document type
Preprint