Reporting Quality Assessment of Sham Acupuncture Randomized Controlled Trials for Acupuncture Intervention in Glaucoma

Read full text
Authors: Yi fan Lei, Xin-Yun Huang, Shi-yong Xue, Yao-Jia-Ni Cao, Xue-Jun Wang, Jue Hong, Xiao-Peng Ma
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness, yet standard treatments often have limitations, prompting interest in acupuncture as an adjuvant therapy. While acupuncture may offer neuroprotective and circulatory benefits, current research quality remains suboptimal. Existing studies are plagued by methodological flaws, including small sample sizes, inconsistent protocols, and high risks of bias, resulting in low-certainty evidence. Crucially, the adherence to international reporting standards—specifically CONSORT, STRICTA, and the recently released SHARE checklist (2023)—has not been systematically evaluated in this field. This lack of rigorous assessment obscures the true efficacy of the intervention. Consequently, there is an urgent need to re-evaluate existing randomized controlled trials against these updated standards to enhance research transparency, address methodological deficiencies, and provide reliable data for clinical practice.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Delphi Technique in Research

Publication details

Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Preprint