Methodology for analyzing the causes of photo image misclassification by computer vision programs based on artificial intelligence in medical imaging

Background. The introduction of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven computer vision programs (CVPs) into medical diagnostics has imposed stricter requirements on the quality of input photographic images. Imaging conditions vary significantly across medical fields, necessitating the establishment of field-specific reference ranges for photometric and textural parameters to ensure that AI models maintain reproducible diagnostic accuracy. A systematic analysis of the causes of erroneous classifications by CVPs is essential for their clinical application and further improvement. Objective: To develop a generalized methodology for analyzing the causes of classification errors in photographic images by processed by AI-driven CVPs. The proposed methodology enables the establishment of reference ranges for photometric and textural parameters for specific medical imaging applications, as well as the development of criteria for excluding images with anomalous values when during preprocessing in medical software systems. Material and methods. The methodology includes eight sequential stages. A dataset of photographic images verified by histological and dermatoscopic examinations was compiled, classified using the CVPs, and assigned to either of the four standard categories (true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative). For each photographic image, thirteen photometric and textural quality metrics were calculated, including: brightness, contrast, sharpness, entropy, high-frequency saturation, proportions of overexposed and underexposed pixels, and mean values ​​and standard deviations of the color channels. Systematic between-group differences were identified using one-way ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA), Welch's test, and Spearman's rank correlation analysis. The image regions that determine the neural network decision were localized using explainable AI techniques. Reference ranges were established from the characteristics of correctly classified photographs (true positive and true negative categories), defined as intervals of [mean − 2 std; mean + 2 std]. The effectiveness of parameter normalization was assessed by the improvement in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results. The proposed methodology was tested using the Derma Onko Check and Melanoma Check CVPs as an example. Its application allowed statistically significant intergroup differences in photometric and textural parameters to be identified (F=13.50–39.31, p