Nursing student’s evaluation of how organisation and the scope of clinical hours impact learning

View at publisher
Authors: Liv Karin Bjerkvik, Berit Taraldsen Valeberg, Helene Margrethe Storebø Opheim, Hilde Knudsrød
Cited by: 0
References: 29

Abstract

Background: Despite global acceptance for the importance of clinical learning in nurse education there is limited evidence for the scope of hours needed to ensure learning outcomes. Aims: To explore how organisation and the scope of clinical hours impact students’ learning. Method: Cross-sectional survey with open- and close-ended questions. Results: Responding students (N=169/42%) had mixed opinions of five-day clinical weeks and five-week clinical periods but agreed that two consecutive placements and combined learning approaches promoted learning. Academic assignments during clinical periods, and weeks of self-directed learning were considered unhelpful. Rather, students emphasized the importance of involvement in daily work and nursing care, one learning approach at a time, support and feedback, and time to prepare, reflect and seek knowledge relevant for placement wards. Conclusion: Our results, and limited evidence of how organisation and the scope of clinical hours impact nursing student’s learning underscore a need for more knowledge.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Nursing education and management Innovations in Medical Education Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Publication details

Journal / source
Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
1–16
Publication date
4 February 2026
Language
EN