What is a protest anyway? Codebook conceptualization is still a first-order concern in LLM-era classification

Read full text
Authors: Andrew Halterman, Katherine A. Keith
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Generative large language models (LLMs) are now used extensively for text classification in computational social science (CSS).In this work, we focus on the steps before and after LLM prompting: conceptualization of the categories to classify and using LLM predictions in downstream statistical inference.We argue these steps have been overlooked in much of LLM-era CSS and LLMs can tempt analysts to skip conceptualization altogether.For example, a political scientist classifying "protest" with LLMs may never be forced to craft a definition: unlike human annotators who would ask clarifying questions, an LLM can silently accept an underspecified concept to classify and return plausible-looking labels.Using simulations, we show that conceptualization failures induce downstream inferential bias that cannot be corrected solely by a more accurate LLM or posthoc bias correction methods.We conclude by reminding CSS analysts that conceptualization is still a first-order concern in the LLM-era and provide concrete advice for pursuing low-cost, unbiased, low-variance downstream estimates.4 §A provides greater details on this terminology.2044 1.Background Concept 2. Systematized Concept 3.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Natural Language Processing Techniques

Publication details

Pages
2043–2059
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN